public:overview
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
public:overview [2021/05/09 17:27] – tsaue | public:overview [2024/07/18 15:16] (current) – tsaue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | See also [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
=== Does chemistry need more physics ? === | === Does chemistry need more physics ? === | ||
- | [{{: | + | [{{: |
=== Is the vacuum really empty ? === | === Is the vacuum really empty ? === | ||
- | An ideal sitatution | + | An ideal situation |
[{{: | [{{: | ||
* **Vacuum polarization**: | * **Vacuum polarization**: | ||
* ** Electron self-energy**: | * ** Electron self-energy**: | ||
- | The splitting is a mere 4 meV, but for hydrogen-like uranium the splitting has grown to an impressive | + | The splitting is a mere 4 μeV, but for hydrogen-like uranium the splitting has grown to an impressive |
It is therefore legitimate to ask if QED-effects could play a role in the chemistry of heavy elements. | It is therefore legitimate to ask if QED-effects could play a role in the chemistry of heavy elements. | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
- Develop a variational approach to QED rather than the usual perturbative one (QED without diagrams) | - Develop a variational approach to QED rather than the usual perturbative one (QED without diagrams) | ||
The most challenging part of the project is to devise ways of handling the divergences of QED using the computational framework of quantum chemistry. | The most challenging part of the project is to devise ways of handling the divergences of QED using the computational framework of quantum chemistry. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | <fs smaller> | ||
+ | [1]. J.A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Modifying Chemical Landscapes by Coupling to Vacuum Fields”, [[http:// | ||
+ | </fs> |
public/overview.1620574055.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/05/09 17:27 by tsaue