public:overview
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:overview [2021/05/09 17:12] – tsaue | public:overview [2024/07/18 15:16] (current) – tsaue | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | See also [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| === Does chemistry need more physics ? === | === Does chemistry need more physics ? === | ||
| - | [{{: | + | [{{: |
| + | |||
| + | === Is the vacuum really empty ? === | ||
| + | |||
| + | An ideal situation for accurate calculations is a molecule alone in space at 0K. However, is the vacuum really empty ? It has been shown that placing a molecule in an otherwise empty cavity will change its reactivity [1]. This is explained by the coupling of the molecule to the zero-point vibrations of the quantized electromagnetic field. | ||
| + | [{{: | ||
| + | * **Vacuum polarization**: | ||
| + | * ** Electron self-energy**: | ||
| + | The splitting is a mere 4 μeV, but for hydrogen-like uranium the splitting has grown to an impressive 76 eV. | ||
| + | It is therefore legitimate to ask if QED-effects could play a role in the chemistry of heavy elements. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Project objectives === | ||
| + | - Set new standards for correlated relativistic molecular calculations, | ||
| + | - Develop a variational approach to QED rather than the usual perturbative one (QED without diagrams) | ||
| + | The most challenging part of the project is to devise ways of handling the divergences of QED using the computational framework of quantum chemistry. | ||
| - | [{{:public: | + | == References == |
| + | <fs smaller> | ||
| + | [1]. J.A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Modifying Chemical Landscapes by Coupling to Vacuum Fields”, [[http://dx.doi.org/ | ||
| + | </fs> | ||
public/overview.1620573131.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/05/09 17:12 by tsaue