Site Tools


Hotfix release available: 2024-02-06a "Kaos". upgrade now! [55.1] (what's this?)
New release available: 2024-02-06 "Kaos". upgrade now! [55] (what's this?)
Hotfix release available: 2023-04-04a "Jack Jackrum". upgrade now! [54.1] (what's this?)
New release available: 2023-04-04 "Jack Jackrum". upgrade now! [54] (what's this?)
Hotfix release available: 2022-07-31b "Igor". upgrade now! [53.1] (what's this?)
Hotfix release available: 2022-07-31a "Igor". upgrade now! [53] (what's this?)
New release available: 2022-07-31 "Igor". upgrade now! [52.2] (what's this?)
New release candidate 2 available: rc2022-06-26 "Igor". upgrade now! [52.1] (what's this?)
New release candidate available: 2022-06-26 "Igor". upgrade now! [52] (what's this?)
Hotfix release available: 2020-07-29a "Hogfather". upgrade now! [51.4] (what's this?)
ncpchem:chiral_field

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ncpchem:chiral_field [2024/04/09 11:19]
114.119.152.34 old revision restored (2024/03/28 19:14)
ncpchem:chiral_field [2024/05/18 19:51] (current)
52.15.57.52 old revision restored (2024/04/30 02:13)
Line 6: Line 6:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 <WRAP column 500px> <WRAP column 500px>
-The CHFClBr equilibrium geometry, optimised at the .. level (taken from here), was scaled in the range 0.5 - 2.0 and the total and EPV energy+The CHFClBr equilibrium geometry, optimised at the scalar relativistic CCSD(T) level (taken from [[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042508|here]]), was scaled in the range 0.5 - 2.0 and the total and E<sub>PV</sub> energy
 was calculated at the B3LYP level. was calculated at the B3LYP level.
 As pointed out by Peter the bond stretching will inevitably lead to a breakdown of the SCF model. Indeed one observes that the HOMO-LUMO gap closes As pointed out by Peter the bond stretching will inevitably lead to a breakdown of the SCF model. Indeed one observes that the HOMO-LUMO gap closes
Line 18: Line 18:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 <WRAP column 500px> <WRAP column 500px>
-Nuclear repulsion energy+The nuclear repulsion energy is evidently not affected by the breakdown of the wavefunction model and drops off as 1/s, where s is the scaling factor.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
Line 27: Line 27:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 <WRAP column 500px> <WRAP column 500px>
-Total energy+The total energy can be fitted to a 5th-order polynomial within the range of validity of the model and has, as expected, a minimum near the scaling factor 1.0.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
Line 38: Line 38:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 <WRAP column 500px> <WRAP column 500px>
-Total EPV energy+The total E<sub>PV</sub> energy is not the most interesting quantity since the change in the chiral field for all atoms except the central carbon atom is rather complicated.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
Line 47: Line 47:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 <WRAP column 500px> <WRAP column 500px>
-EPV energy from carbon+More interesting is the contribution to the E<sub>PV</sub> energy from the central carbon atom. Surprisingly it increases within the range of validity of the model and goes through a minimum around s=0.82. It can be fitted well to a 4th-order polynomial.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
ncpchem/chiral_field.1712654354.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/09 11:19 by 114.119.152.34