This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
ncpchem:chiral_field [2025/06/05 08:21] 47.128.58.11 old revision restored (2025/04/19 14:28) |
ncpchem:chiral_field [2025/06/12 16:35] (current) 47.128.36.154 old revision restored (2024/12/10 22:52) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
</ | </ | ||
<WRAP column 500px> | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
- | The CHFClBr equilibrium geometry, optimised at the .. level (taken from here), was scaled in the range 0.5 - 2.0 and the total and EPV energy | + | The CHFClBr equilibrium geometry, optimised at the scalar relativistic CCSD(T) |
was calculated at the B3LYP level. | was calculated at the B3LYP level. | ||
As pointed out by Peter the bond stretching will inevitably lead to a breakdown of the SCF model. Indeed one observes that the HOMO-LUMO gap closes | As pointed out by Peter the bond stretching will inevitably lead to a breakdown of the SCF model. Indeed one observes that the HOMO-LUMO gap closes | ||
and the SCF did not converge beyond scaling factor 1.4 | and the SCF did not converge beyond scaling factor 1.4 | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | The nuclear repulsion energy is evidently not affected by the breakdown of the wavefunction model and drops off as 1/s, where s is the scaling factor. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | The total energy can be fitted to a 5th-order polynomial within the range of validity of the model and has, as expected, a minimum near the scaling factor 1.0. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | The total E< | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | More interesting is the contribution to the E< | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 200px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 350px> | ||
+ | <file CHFXopt.xyz> | ||
+ | 5 | ||
+ | scf done: -3172.829144 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Br -2.517620 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Cl -2.454927 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | r(C-Br): 1.945 Å\\ | ||
+ | r(C-Cl): 1.766 Å\\ | ||
+ | r(C-H): | ||
+ | Total E< | ||
+ | Central carbon: 5.523E-20 au\\ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 200px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 350px> | ||
+ | <file cb_CHFX_Ropt.xyz> | ||
+ | 13 | ||
+ | scf done: -3477.261538 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Cl -2.539540 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Br -4.092424 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | |||
+ | r(C-Br): 4.469 Å\\ | ||
+ | r(C-Cl): 4.316 Å\\ | ||
+ | r(C-H): | ||
+ | Total E< | ||
+ | Central carbon: 2.905E-23 au\\ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | <WRAP column 200px> | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 350px> | ||
+ | <file cb2_CHFXopt.xyz> | ||
+ | 21 | ||
+ | scf done: -3781.817398 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Cl -3.094602 | ||
+ | Br -5.390750 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 500px> | ||
+ | Total E< | ||
+ | Centrl carbon: -3.737E-25 au\\ | ||
</ | </ | ||
</ | </ |